Skip to main content
Field-data review · advisory

Advisory field-data checks before office review

SurveyMarkup can highlight common field-data patterns that often deserve a second look — pole height, prism constant, GNSS quality notes, resection geometry and RL jumps — as advisory review prompts. It flags patterns for a human; it does not prove field data is correct.

Advisory only

Advisory and unverified — not for survey deliverables. A registered surveyor must confirm any output before it is relied on.

What SurveyMarkup can flag or organise

  • Pole height and prism-constant prompts
  • GNSS quality and resection-geometry notes
  • RL jumps and missing codes worth a check

What it cannot prove or certify

  • It does not prove field data is correct
  • It does not certify the survey
  • It does not replace surveyor judgement

Patterns that often deserve review

Some signals recur across jobs. Surfacing them early gives the office reviewer a head start without pretending to make the call.

  • Pole height and prism-constant prompts
  • GNSS quality and resection-geometry notes
  • RL jumps and missing feature codes

Advisory prompts, with false positives

A flag is a prompt, not a verdict. Some flags will be false positives — that is expected for an advisory aid, and a reviewer decides what matters.

What it does not do

It does not prove field data is correct, does not certify the survey and does not replace the surveyor's judgement.

Worked example · synthetic

A day's observations are scanned before reduction.

What SurveyMarkup surfaces

  • A pole-height entry that looks inconsistent
  • An unusual F1/F2 spread on one setup
  • A resection with weak geometry flagged for a look

Reviewer's call: The surveyor decides which prompts matter; some will be false positives, and none of them prove the field data is correct.

Frequently asked questions

Does it prove my field data is correct?

No. It flags common patterns as advisory prompts. Whether they matter is a registered surveyor's call.

Will it produce false positives?

Yes — that is expected for an advisory aid. A reviewer decides which prompts are relevant.

What inputs does it use?

It works from plain-text reports and review summaries; outputs stay advisory and unverified.

Related survey workflows

Related next steps

View sample checks in the QA demo

Advisory and unverified — not for survey deliverables. A registered surveyor must confirm any output before it is relied on.

Ready to review with SurveyMarkup?

Every output stays advisory and unverified — not for survey deliverables; registered surveyor confirmation required.

View sample checks in the QA demo